Selasa, 30 April 2019

Comparison of the two journals about grammar -Rida Yulianti

Assalamu’alaikum.. Hallo fellas! It’s been a long time I didn’t post anything on my blog because I’ve juat got a task from my lecturer and this is more challenging becaus I have to find out the similaritie and the differences between both journal which have been read.. here we go!


Inteoduction& purpose
The similarities : 
  • Both explain the importance of grammar for mastering English language skills by using interesting methods
  • Teacher or lecturer must master grammar competence&performance

The differences :
  • Jurnal 1 : The background of the problem raised is that all English students must master grammar because grammar plays an important role in 4 english skills such as reading, writing, speaking and listening
  • Jurnal 2 : the background of the problem raised is that grammar need to encourage students’s speaking skill


Method 
The similarity :
  • Both use the same process but in different words.
The differences:
  • Jurnal 1 : This research was a collaborative classroom action research consisting of four main steps. They were planning the action, implementing the action, observing the action, and reflecting the action. In this research, the researcher was the lecturer of grammar class, especially advanced English grammar. A Semester of Teaching Learning Planning (RPS) of grammar for the fifth semester and blank forms of observation sheets were given to the collaborator. The observation sheets were in the form of field notes which were usted to report everything related to the lecturer’s activities, students’ activities, and students’ responses when the lecturer implemented PBL in grammar class. There were two cycles with two meetings of each cycle in this research.
  • jurnal 2: This study used research and development approach, Borg dan Gall (2007:589-599). Development means to encourage the students’ courage to speak English based on OQILAG method, engaging of some steps of the research development: validity, research, try out, test of validity, systematic accuracy and efficiency. Gay, Mill and Airasian (2009:18-19) stated that the completeness of ideas of Borg and Gall were the research process which were based on the needs and then they were developed get a product to fulfil this needs. Education product such as training for lesson materials, learning materials, supporting materials, processing and connection materials.

Participants :
*jurnal 1 : subjects of the research were 9 students of the fifth semester of English department of education faculty in the academic year of 2016/2017, Hasyim Asy’ari University (UNHASY) Tebuireng Jombang.
*jurnal 2 : Students of Jakarta Selatan Jagakarsa Cipedak Muhammadiyah junior high school.

In conclusion, both of journal discuss about grammar that must be mastered by students to master english language. So the point is we have to learn more and try to implement it in our daily life so our goals to be good in english can be achieved :)

Thank you☺️