Sabtu, 11 Mei 2019

The result of both journal can be explained as follows: 
1.‭ Problem-based  learning  could  improve  grammar  competence  in‬ the  fifth  semester 
students  of ‭ ‬English ‭ ‬department  of ‭ ‬education ‭ ‬faculty  of ‭ ‬Hasyim ‭ ‬Asyari  University 
(UNHASY) Tebuireng Jombang in the academic year of 2016/2017. 

2.‭ ‭In cycle one, ‭ ‬the lecturer‭ ‬activities was following the procedures of problem-based ‬‬‬
learning that she planned. She walked around the class when the students discussed. 
There was something less in cycle one. She only used her feelings to stop the time for 
discussion and presentation without telling the students the exact time. Then, she gave 
the time limitation in cycle two after getting information from the observer. The time 
for discussion was thirty minutes as well as the presentation.  
3.‭ ‭The students’ activities ‭ ‬in ‭ ‬cycle one ‭ ‬and cycle two‭ were basically the same. In cycle ‬‬‬
one, there was one group who did the assignment from another lecturer. So that thbey 
did not pay full attention ‭ ‬to their discussion. In cycle two, all  of the students were 
active in joining the discussion and also the presentation. All of the groups wanted to 
present their discussion result in the second meeting of cycle two. But finally, the 
lecturer made a lottery to choose the group presenting their discussion result. Besides, 
all of the groups presented their discussion result, made their own reading text without 
searching from internet or other sources. Their mean score was 66.7 in cycle one and 
72.8 in cycle two.  Then, 44.4% of students passed the minimum ‭ ‬mastery criteria in 
cycle one and 88.9% of students passed the minimum mastery criteria in cycle two. It 
means that there was an improvement of their grammar competence. 
4.‭ ‭The students’ ‭ ‬responses were good ‭ ‬since cycle one. ‭ ‬Even though some ‭ ‬of them said ‬‬
that they still got difficulty in applying their grammar in their daily life. In cycle two, 
the students ‭ ‬were more motivated ‭ ‬to  join the grammar class. It was little different 
between cycle one and cycle two.  
From ‭ ‬the ‭ ‬conclusions ‭ ‬above, ‭ ‬it ‭ ‬could ‭ ‬be ‭ ‬seen ‭ ‬that ‭ ‬grammar ‭ ‬was ‭ ‬learned ‭ ‬more 
interestingly by using PBL. This study found something different from the previous studies 
using PBL. ‭ ‬The ‭ ‬finding ‭ ‬was ‭ ‬that ‭ ‬the ‭ ‬increase ‭ ‬of ‭ ‬the ‭ ‬students’ ‭ ‬grammar competence ‭ ‬was ‭ ‬in 
line  with the  increase  of their  speaking  skill and  their writing skill.  It was because  PBL 
applied in this grammar class gave the opportunities to the students to speak and write more 
and more. Then, the students seemed to compete in making the better writing and to speak 
more in presenting their ideas related to the problems of the grammar materials given by the 
lecturer. Besides, their ‭ ‬motivation to learn  also had a role in the success of their  grammar 
achievements.  

Thank you.

Tidak ada komentar:

Posting Komentar